Improving Outcomes Together: Court and Child Welfare Collaboration
نویسنده
چکیده
The dependency court and the child welfare agency are both responsible for protecting children and mending families. Yet, too often, the court and the agency work on their common goals independently of one another. This paper explores the ways in which juvenile and family courts and child welfare agencies across the country are sharing data and information, and collaborating with one another outside the courtroom in order to improve outcomes for the children in their care. In states and communities across the nation, courts and agencies are forming substantive collaborations which not only unite them in achieving their common goals, but are outcome-oriented efforts to improve the performance of both in achieving safety and permanence for children. Michigan Supreme Court Chief Justice and Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care member Maura Corrigan states, “It is incumbent upon us to collaborate with each other for the sake of the children.” Innovative examples of court and agency collaboration can be found in communities across the nation: from a partnership in the Florida juvenile court with a child development expert to create a series of evidence-based parenting programs, to an effort in Kentucky to include university doctoral candidates in efforts to improve outcomes for children in foster care, to the Children’s Justice Initiative in Minnesota, which encourages communication between and informed decision-making by the Judiciary and Department of Human Services. Nationally, the Pew Commission released a series of recommendations targeted at reforming federal financing June 2005
منابع مشابه
The role of interagency collaboration for substance-abusing families involved with child welfare.
Meeting the needs of families involved with the child welfare system because of a substance abuse issue remains a challenge for child welfare practitioners. In order to improve services to these families, there has been an increasing focus on improving collaboration between child welfare, treatment providers, and the court systems. This paper presents the results from qualitative interviews wit...
متن کاملHow does family drug treatment court participation affect child welfare outcomes?
Parental substance use is a risk factor for child maltreatment. Family drug treatment courts (FDTCs) have emerged in the United States as a policy option to treat the underlying condition and promote family preservation. This study examines the effectiveness of FDTCs in North Carolina on child welfare outcomes. Data come from North Carolina records from child protection services, court system, ...
متن کاملSubstance-abusing child welfare parents: treatment and child placement outcomes.
The authors present findings from their study of 167 child welfare parents referred for substance abuse assessments. Relationships between gender, prior treatment, court-ordered intervention, significant others' support, and treatment and placement outcomes are examined. Findings indicate significant others' support positively influences all outcomes while court-ordered intervention is not pred...
متن کاملIn Support of Reauthorization of Court Improvement Program
o Courts should adopt court performance measures to ensure that they can track cases, to increase accountability, and to inform decisions about the allocation of court resources; and o Incentives and requirements should be established for effective collaboration between courts and child welfare agencies on behalf of children in foster care; and o Children and parents should have a strong voice ...
متن کاملRunning head: EFFECTIVENESS OF PARENT-TO-PARENT An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Parent-to-Parent Program in Changing Attitudes and Increasing Parental Engagement in the Juvenile Dependency System
Parent mentor programs, which have helped parents with disabled children, are emerging in the field of child welfare as a means of engaging parents in the juvenile dependency process. Two current studies assessed a parent-to-parent program implemented in King County, Washington. Study 1 assessed a change in attitudes that occurred following participation in the program. Study 2 assessed differe...
متن کامل